On Leadership is a column by MSA Superintendent-in-Residence Dr. Baron R. Davis
Ask someone what makes a magnet school distinctive, and the answer will often begin with its theme: STEM, the arts, health sciences, international studies, technology, or another area of specialization.
Themes matter. They can create identity, attract students, organize learning, and connect schools to powerful opportunities.
But a theme, by itself, is not a strategy.
The real test of a magnet school is not what appears on its website, signage, or course catalog. It is what students experience every day.
Here is a question I believe every magnet school leader should consider: If we removed your school’s name, theme, specialized course titles, and marketing materials, would I know I was in a magnet school simply by watching students learn?
Would I see students solving authentic problems? Would I see the theme influencing how they think, collaborate, create, and demonstrate learning? Would I see meaningful connections with industry, higher education, community partners, or the world beyond school? Most importantly, would students be able to explain how their experience is preparing them for what comes next?
That is the difference between having a theme and leading a design.
A STEM magnet, for example, should not be distinctive simply because it offers robotics or engineering courses. Its design should influence how students approach problems across their learning experience. Similarly, an arts magnet should offer more than opportunities to perform. Creativity, critique, production, expression, and artistic thinking should be woven into the school experience.
The challenge is that even innovative programs can become conventional over time. What began as a bold vision can gradually become a collection of courses, annual events, traditions, and marketing language.
That is why magnet leadership requires continuous design.
We should regularly ask, “What is our school intentionally designed to accomplish?” Where can we see that design in the daily student experience? And what should students experience here that they could not experience in quite the same way somewhere else?
These questions should lead us to examine curriculum, instruction, schedules, partnerships, learning environments, student voice, and access to opportunity. If those structures do not reinforce the magnet’s purpose, the work is not finished.
Magnet schools have an important opportunity to lead public education in this space. They can demonstrate what happens when schools move beyond adding innovative programs and instead organize the entire student experience around a clear purpose.
A magnet designation should therefore represent more than what a school offers. It should represent how a school has been intentionally designed.
The theme may attract students to a magnet school. The design is what determines what happens once they arrive.
Baron Davis, PhD, is founder and CEO of The Noegenesis Group and the former superintendent of Richland School District Two in Columbia, South Carolina, where he helped design magnet programs spanning research and design, the arts, and computer science. His work centers on the conviction that connection precedes curriculum.
4005 Wisconsin Avenue NW #5997
Washington, DC 20016
202.824.0672
